# FLAME AI Decision Audit System — Risk Monitoring & Trigger Points **Rodrik Publishing | Version 2 | Effective: May 1, 2026** ## Purpose This document defines specific monitoring signals, trigger thresholds, and named response actions for the three highest-probability risks to FLAME's viability. --- ## Trigger Point 1 — Anthropic API Pricing or Policy Change **Monitoring:** Anthropic developer newsletter and API changelog, reviewed weekly by Dr. Rodriguez. **Trigger threshold:** Anthropic announces a pricing increase of 2x or more, OR announces usage restrictions affecting commercial deployment. **Action within 30 days:** - Evaluate cost impact at current and projected session volumes - Test the API proxy with one alternative model (GPT-4o or equivalent) - Determine whether monetization, model migration, or throttling is required - Document decision in the self-audit log **Legal counsel contact:** Doug Kim, Kim Lahey & Killough, Greenville SC — kimandlahey.com — IT, IP, and AI law. No retainer required — named contact for rapid consultation if trigger fires. **Current status:** Monitoring active. No trigger reached. --- ## Trigger Point 2 — Competitive Platform Launch **Monitoring:** LinkedIn, industry newsletters, professional network — monthly scan by Dr. Rodriguez. **Trigger threshold:** A named enterprise platform (over $1B market cap or 1,000+ employees) launches a product explicitly described as an AI governance audit or AI decision certification tool. **Action within 30 days:** - Conduct feature comparison between competing product and FLAME - Identify three specific differentiators to emphasize in book and speaking content - Evaluate whether industry-specific FLAME variants should be accelerated - Document competitive landscape update **Current status:** Monitoring active. No trigger reached. --- ## Trigger Point 3 — EU AI Act or Equivalent Regulatory Action **Monitoring:** EU AI Act official publications and academic channels — quarterly review, with immediate review triggered by network alerts. **Trigger threshold:** Any regulatory publication explicitly references tools that certify AI governance readiness, OR uses language that could reclassify "FLAME Certified" as a regulated term. **Action within 14 days:** - Contact legal counsel (see below) to review whether "FLAME Certified" requires rebranding - Review FLAME disclaimer language against the regulatory text - Determine whether Q3 2026 EU AI Act self-assessment needs to be accelerated - Document findings in the self-audit log **Legal counsel contact:** Doug Kim, Kim Lahey & Killough, Greenville SC — kimandlahey.com — specializes in IT, IP, and AI law. Has published on AI legal rights (ABA 2025, SC Lawyer 2025). No retainer required. **Current status:** Monitoring active. EU AI Act self-assessment planned Q3 2026. No trigger reached. --- ## Trigger Point 4 — Succession Risk **Monitoring:** Dr. Rodriguez's availability and operational continuity. **Trigger threshold:** Dr. Rodriguez unreachable for more than 2 hours during a Tier 1 incident. **Action:** Wilmer Toro, EVP, exercises emergency authority per the Triage Protocol v2. **Tiebreaker:** Christian Calix, Independent Consultant, resolves disagreements between Dr. Rodriguez and Wilmer Toro. **Credential access:** Wilmer Toro holds credentials for Vercel, GitHub, Anthropic API, Resend, and domain registrar. **Current status:** Triage Protocol v2 published. Credential escrow to be completed before May 5, 2026. --- ## Recommended Monitoring Improvements Three Google Alerts to set up immediately (free, takes 5 minutes): 1. "EU AI Act certification tools" 2. "AI governance audit platform" 3. "Anthropic API pricing" These convert passive monitoring into active notification at zero cost. --- ## Annual Review This document is reviewed and updated annually, or immediately following any triggered event. *Version 2 — Updated to reflect 2-hour succession threshold, Christian Calix as tiebreaker, credential access documentation, and Google Alerts recommendation.* *Last reviewed: May 1, 2026*